Adobe Photoshop Elements 4.0
For our Photoshop Elements test, we used a selection of 400 three megapixel photographs taken in a variety of surroundings using the batch file processing function in the Elements Editor. We performed all of the auto fixes, including Auto Levels, Auto Contrast, Auto Colour and Sharpen before resizing the image to 640x480 and saving as a high quality JPEG.
-
Jetway JNC62K (GeForce 8200)
-
Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H (AMD 780G)
-
MSI K9AGM3-FIH (AMD 690G)
-
Gigabyte GA-73PVM-S2H (GeForce 7100)
-
Asus P5E-VM HDMI (Intel G35)
-
430.6
-
446.0
-
477.0
-
496.3
-
502.3
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
The performance of the Jetway board is excellent—even despite the fact it’s running only single-channel memory. It pulls up 15 seconds before the Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H, which is based on the AMD 780G. And, compared to the previous generation of boards, it's significantly faster – it edges out a lead of over a minute in some cases.
File Compression & Encryption:
Our file compression and decompression tests were split into two halves to cover a broad spectrum of performance. The first test we ran was to compress and encrypt the MPEG-2 source file from our video encoding test with the highest quality compression ratio. Secondly, we compressed and encrypted the folder of 400 photographs used in our Photoshop Elements test with the same compression settings.
-
Jetway JNC62K (GeForce 8200)
-
Asus P5E-VM HDMI (Intel G35)
-
Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H (AMD 780G)
-
Gigabyte GA-73PVM-S2H (GeForce 7100)
-
MSI K9AGM3-FIH (AMD 690G)
-
184.6
-
196.0
-
217.0
-
259.7
-
423.0
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
-
Jetway JNC62K (GeForce 8200)
-
Asus P5E-VM HDMI (Intel G35)
-
Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H (AMD 780G)
-
Gigabyte GA-73PVM-S2H (GeForce 7100)
-
MSI K9AGM3-FIH (AMD 690G)
-
185.0
-
194.0
-
205.0
-
215.0
-
247.3
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
Again, in both large and small file compression the Jetway board is faster by at least a few seconds over the next fastest board. Compared to the Gigabyte 780G board, it’s again 20 to 30 seconds faster even in this quite short test. Why? Possibly due to the fact that the single chip solution seems to work better and when it’s coupled with AMD's more efficient use of memory, it puts the Intel-based GeForce 7100 solution to bed as it seems to work exceptionally well.
File Decompression & Decryption:
The two RAR archives created during the compression and encryption tests were then decompressed and decrypted.
-
Jetway JNC62K (GeForce 8200)
-
Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H (AMD 780G)
-
MSI K9AGM3-FIH (AMD 690G)
-
Gigabyte GA-73PVM-S2H (GeForce 7100)
-
Asus P5E-VM HDMI (Intel G35)
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
-
MSI K9AGM3-FIH (AMD 690G)
-
Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H (AMD 780G)
-
Gigabyte GA-73PVM-S2H (GeForce 7100)
-
MSI K9AGM3-FIH (AMD 690G)
-
Asus P5E-VM HDMI (Intel G35)
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
In decompression, the Jetway’s performance is still ahead of the competition by a decent margin.
Xvid Encoding:
We tested video encoding performance using VirtualDub-MPEG version 1.6.15 and a multithreaded version of the Xvid codec, along with the LAME MT MP3 encoder for encoding audio. We did a two-pass encode of a 15-minute 276MB digital TV recording with a target file size of 100MB.
-
Asus P5E-VM HDMI (Intel G35)
-
Jetway JNC62K (GeForce 8200)
-
Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H (AMD 780G)
-
Gigabyte GA-73PVM-S2H (GeForce 7100)
-
MSI K9AGM3-FIH (AMD 690G)
-
1115.7
-
1138.0
-
1145.7
-
1172.7
-
1187.0
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
For the first time the Jetway doesn't win by a huge margin – the Asus Intel G35-based board is slightly faster, but the Jetway still outperforms the current generation Gigabyte, AMD 780G board.
Want to comment? Please log in.